Elon Musk’s 5-Step Design Process in D&T Teaching

In Design & Technology (D&T) education, managing growing class sizes and increasingly complex student needs is crucial. Reflecting on the methods I developed for my students, I found they resonated closely with Elon Musk’s 5-Step Design Process. By incidentally applying these principles, I was able to streamline teaching, improve student work quality, and help students, many with autism, achieve higher outputs efficiently.

Step 1: Make the Requirements Less Dumb

Musk emphasizes questioning the validity of requirements. In D&T, that means ensuring every step in the design process is both necessary and clear to students. Traditionally, students begin their coursework with mind maps, but these often lead to unfocused results. To address this, I encouraged my students to focus only on activities within their own environments—home and school—where they have personal experience. This made it easier for them to identify relevant design challenges and conduct meaningful research.

I also refined their product research by cutting unnecessary steps, such as the ‘Minus’ component in the Plus, Minus, Interesting (PMI) method, allowing students to focus only on useful features and innovative design concepts.

Action for Teachers:

• Encourage students to focus on design challenges within familiar environments like home and school.
• Help students identify root causes of design problems using techniques like the 5 Whys.
• Streamline product research by eliminating irrelevant steps, such as the ‘Minus’ component of PMI.
• Ensure students focus on their functional design specifications, avoiding vague or overly broad topics.
• Instruct students to write their design specifications clearly on each ideation sheet to stay on task.

Step 2: Try to Delete Part of the Process

Many students waste time on redundant sketches or unnecessary annotations. To streamline the process, I taught them to start with quick 2D sketches rather than 3D forms, reserving the latter for when more detail was needed. This simplified their visual communication and saved time.

A significant deletion was removing the ‘Minus’ section from PMI analysis, allowing students to focus on what matters—useful product features.

Action for Teachers:

• Guide students to focus on 2D sketches first for quick exploration before moving on to 3D representations.
• Eliminate unnecessary annotations by ensuring students focus only on critical design specifications.
• Remove tasks that don’t add value to the design process, like the ‘Minus’ component in PMI analysis.
• Encourage students to question if every step they take in the design process is truly necessary.
• Simplify the prototyping phase by working with students to explore alternative materials and jointing methods that save time.

Step 3: Simplify or Optimize the Design

I taught my students to question each step in their design process. Every action they take must be justified, and they are encouraged to debate and ask questions before moving forward. This makes each remaining task critical and necessary. For example, not every student needs a mood board unless it serves a specific purpose in their project.

In the prototyping phase, I played a key role in guiding students through material choices, jointing methods, and finishing techniques, helping them see how alternatives could simplify their work and reduce production time without compromising on quality.

Action for Teachers:

• Teach students to question each process in their design journey and ensure they are fully convinced before moving forward.
• Ensure each student’s project is bespoke, with tailored requirements and steps that match their design direction.
• Simplify complex tasks by offering alternative methods for materials, jointing, and finishes.
• Help students identify alternative approaches that will reduce anxiety and improve their ability to manage tools and materials.

Step 4: Accelerate Cycle Time

I encouraged students to share their ideas in class, which not only helped them build confidence but also allowed them to learn from each other’s approaches. Even though they were working on independent projects, the cross-pollination of ideas led to faster progress for everyone.

To accelerate the ideation phase, I taught students to make quick iterations and test ideas early using physical models, enabling them to spot problems and fix them faster. This early testing prevents them from becoming overwhelmed by unnecessary edits later.

Additionally, I minimized distractions by banning handphones and other devices in the design studio, ensuring students remained focused. Each design session began with a review of completed work, and we collaboratively planned the next steps on a visual map. This helped students stay on track and maintain momentum.

Action for Teachers:

• Foster a collaborative environment by encouraging students to share ideas and give feedback in class.
• Minimize distractions by banning handphones and other devices from the design studio.
• Begin each session with a visual roadmap to recap previous progress and plan the next steps as a class.
• Allow students to provide input into their own design process, helping them feel involved and motivated to move forward.
• Emphasize the importance of keeping designs simple to reduce complexity and improve manageability.
• Encourage students to make quick iterations and test ideas early using models to "fail fast, learn fast."

Step 5: Automate (The Future)

While we haven’t fully automated the design process, I introduced a customized GPT for Design Journaling to help students who were ready for more independence. This AI tool doesn’t give answers but instead guides students with questions, helping them reflect on their decisions and think critically about their designs.

One student, after losing her entire journal, used the GPT to reproduce her work, which ended up surpassing that of her peers. The future of automation in D&T classrooms may lie in tools like this, where students can manage their projects with minimal teacher input, guided by AI.

As AI evolves, tools like GPT could play a more prominent role in managing larger classrooms by helping students independently work through complex tasks, freeing up teachers to focus on higher-level facilitation.

Action for Teachers:

• Consider using AI tools like customized GPT to guide students through their design process, especially those ready for independent work.
• Use AI not to provide answers but to help students reflect and think critically about their design decisions.
• Explore potential areas where processes could be automated or streamlined to reduce teacher input and foster student autonomy.

https://designjournalsos.blogspot.com/2024/07/optimizing-your-learning-with-openais.html

Iterative Design Process

It’s important to emphasize that the design process is iterative. Students may need to revisit earlier stages, such as the design brief or specifications, and adjust or delete elements if new insights emerge. This iterative approach is key to maintaining a flexible and evolving project workflow.

Conclusion: Elevate Your D&T Classroom with Musk’s 5-Step Process

By adopting these strategies, D&T teachers can improve both the efficiency and quality of teaching and learning in their classrooms. From simplifying requirements to automating parts of the process, Elon Musk’s 5-step design process provides a roadmap for helping students produce higher-quality projects while reducing teacher burnout.

As we continue to refine these strategies and explore tools like AI, D&T teachers in Singapore and beyond can empower their students to take greater ownership of their work while ensuring that the design process remains efficient and impactful.

#DesignandTechnology #D&T #ElonMusk #EducationInnovation #StudentProjects #EfficiencyInTeaching #D&TStudents #SingaporeEducation #DesignProcess #AIInEducation